ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted radical right hemicolectomy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the right colon. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database identified 288 right colon cancer patients who underwent either robotic-assisted (n=57) or laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy (n=231) between October 2014 and October 2020 at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. There were 161 males and 127 females, aging (60.3±12.8) years (range: 17 to 86 years). After propensity score matching as 1∶4 between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy, there were 56 cases in robotic group and 176 cases in laparoscipic group. Perioperative outcomes and overall survival were compared between the two groups using t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, χ2 test, Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test, respectively. Results: The total operative time was similar between the robotic and laparoscopic group ((206.9±60.7) minutes vs. (219.9±56.3) minutes, t=-1.477, P=0.141). Intraoperative bleeding was less in the robotic group (50 (20) ml vs. 50 (50) ml, Z=-4.591, P<0.01), while the number of lymph nodes retrieved was significantly higher (36.0±10.0 vs. 29.0±10.1, t=4.491, P<0.01). Patients in robotic group experienced significantly shorter hospital stay, shorter time to first flatus, and defecation (t: -2.888, -2.946, -2.328, all P<0.05). Moreover, the overall peri-operative complication rate was similar between robotic and laparoscopic group (17.9% vs. 22.7%, χ²=0.596,P=0.465). The 3-year overall survival were 92.9% and 87.9% respectively and the 3-year disease-free survival rates were 83.1% and 82.6% with no statistical significance between the robotic and laparoscopic group (P>0.05). Conclusions: Compared to laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy, robot-assisted right hemicolectomy could improve some short-term clinical outcomes. The two procedures are both achieving comparable survival.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Colectomy , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy , Prognosis , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To study the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinicopathologic data of 247 patients with GIST from January 2003 to November 2012 in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Medical College, and the prognostic factors were evaluated retrospectively by univariate and multivariate analysis with Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Patients were followed up with a median time of 26 months (1 to 113 months). Twenty-six patients developed recurrence or metastasis, and 18 died of GIST. The 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 94%, 91% and 83% respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age, tumor location, tumor size, mitotic count and tumor rupture were predictive factors of survival after resection of primary GIST (all P<0.01). For patients at intermediate and high risk to relapse, imatinib group had a higher 5-year overall survival rate than non-imatinib group (85.7% vs. 81.0%, P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size (RR=2.248, 95%CI:1.081-4.677, P=0.030), mitotic count (RR=2.220, 95%CI:1.032-4.776, P=0.041) and tumor rupture (RR=5.183, 95%CI:1.677-16.017, P=0.004) were independent prognostic factors.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Tumor size, mitotic count and tumor rupture affect the prognosis after resection of primary GIST independently. Imatinib adjuvant therapy can improve overall survival of patients at intermediate and high risk to relapse after surgery.</p>